Original publication date: 24/09/2024
Hello and welcome,
This website discusses a proposed Grand Unification Theory (GUT) or Theory of Everything (TOE) named the “Dot Theory.”
That may either profess grandness, or mean little to you, but put briefly; this website outlines a new proposed theoretical framework of reality. One that makes a certain class of predictions more accurate. It is published as a website for access and flexibility.
Such frameworks are in a class of models on reality like Newtonian Physics, the Standard Model, Quantum Physics or the Theory of Evolution. Each of which, are only ways of successfully describing aspects of reality that help bring order, structure and predictability to our experience of reality. Each of which, when they are proven to offer predictive capability, are considered to be successful and therefore true or correct.
These theoretical frameworks have a significant and reality-defining impact on how we understand information and how we can help ourselves move through the world, and consequentially, care for ourselves more efficiently. They also helps us manage intellectual, energy and physical resources as well as optimise ways to manage critical information.
The site’s purpose is to present such a new theoretical framework called the Dot theory to:
a) enable peer review of its proposed logic, to
b) confidently support the development of a data base management system that is useful for true predictive healthcare and,
c) to ratify its logic as the GUT.
Introduction:
A theory of this scale, even one on the topic of the fabric of the reality of nature itself (not a typo), does not solve all problems immediately: it provides a framework of understanding that enables the solving of a class of problems. In this case, a class of problems involved with how we observe and make reality real (the fabric of the reality of nature itself). This is a highly unusual set of things to consider, but in one sense only recognises that formulating any successful theory only means that we can use its framework to reliably solve problems and make technology that makes our lives better from it. For reference, the Dot theory can be considered exploitation of the anthropic selection effect that is inherent to all observations.
It means that we can understand our personal relationship with reality better through it, and make the information available from our observations of reality to make it increasingly malleable to our social and personal needs by applying it.
The three distinct and great Physico-Mathematical theories on the fabric of reality (Physics’ theories using mathematical logics, functions and movements) that have leapfrogged humanity into a modern era of comfort, safety, health and wellbeing are the Newtonian (Classical), Standard and Quantum mechanical models and all their derivatives respectively. Other theories on the fabric of reality, like Social, Economic and Earth-Sciences theories have assisted these (using non-mathematical logics), to form one big pool of tools developed from semi-homogenous frameworks of functioning theories, that define our every day experience of life and we call reality.
Elements:
Whilst the subject matter and computation of elements of each of these theories may vary, each framework has one element in common: Predictability. The Dot theory addresses our relationship with the logics that offer us predictability.
The Dot theory also does something which should be done by any aspiring GUT: it presents a framework that contains a method to adjust both mathematical and non-mathematical logics. For reference, it can be positioned as a “Logic-obviated and mandated, technical modification to the current relationship Sciences, laws, theories and equations hold to the data that describes the information describing the structure of the logic (whether mathematical or non-mathematical) used to describe the relationships between the data of the reality it describes successfully”.
In Physics, the Dot theory’s effect translates to adaptations in our relationship to the mathematics used in the Schrodinger equation. An equation which, according to the Dot theory, needs to be modified to represent the observations that: a) Reality is data and that b) what we consider as recorded and calculated data (whether on a notepad or floating around in structured computing frameworks), is in fact an opportunity to recognise, and compute it, as hyper-data if we know additional information about the observation:
Hyper data is information that, when it is useful to do so, can be viewed from one perspective; simply as data that can yield a certain amount of valuable decision making when computed (as intended for its naturally used, observed and intended purpose and done without further consideration), and can, upon analysis, be recognised to offer additional, potentially meaningful, information by means of analysis for the existence, presentation, state and correlation of the information to other, somehow similar information as well.
It is known, and obvious, that this can be useful, if willing and able to observe the data differently; i.e. Correlatively (for correlating patterns) and purposefully (with a view to potentially make better predictive decisions), and that doing so, inevitably offers better predictions of outcomes, if using that data analytically and when considering to act on the data describing recurring predictive patterns for predictive purposes. It is logically more accurate therefore, for us to represent our relationship to the data as such, where we use it. The Dot theory is simply a logic that states that: reality is data whenever we look at it, and that data can be viewed (and when possible, ought to be calculated as) hyperdata because it is self-evident that this would make more accurate and more valid predictions about reality. This, therefore, logically, makes all computing frameworks where the relative position of the data within that framework can be observed and therefore used to describe reality by this method, more real than the relationship currently entertained.
This is obviously, yet oddly so, in that “data” or “information” as found in any database or magazine, not only contains its own meaning (measurement) but also inherently, its specific accessibility- and permissions- pathway. This pathway that is obviously revealing if and more closely observed, recorded and analysed, for predictive relationships (as a variant in topological surface) can potentially bring additional, prediction-improving data of its own, to the computation.
It can represent (if observed as a layer of meta data that can that can take a form that can be composed of 0 and 1 codes that can be observed to take a form or topology) the fabric of the tools used to describe our measurements of our observations on reality and used to make corrections on our observer bias. Practically speaking, this can be generated by a Digital avatar archetypes and used for 100% individualised, real-time predictive healthcare and human optimisation modelling, and some experimental physics applications.
The logical argument (found in tab logic) is simply that because doing this process (of including recursively analytical data within any computation) always makes the outcome more correct when a beneficial question is asked, makes a theory outlining our relationship to the data as relative to outcomes more true, even if only in the more defined (more available data) cases, than our current expressions of the theory of General Relativity. Therefore it must, logically, alter its terms to reflect our more true relationship with data to be a more true reflection of our relationship with reality.
In other words, it says that TGR is correct as a computational method but that including a method to compute the observer bias the recorded data suffers from as an object alongside it where possible, would, inherently, make it more correct. This, when considered relative to the available data, would, is the argument the paper makes, make the Theory of General Relatively relatively universally correct, and elevate it to what this paper considers a logical version of a GUT for an evolving human life experience of reality based on observed and recorded data.
As a mathematical approach, it uses a game-theoretical (von Neumann) perspective on strategy and purpose to reorganise our sense of computational perspective to the data describing reality.
As a geometrical mathematical object it reorganises our described and computed relationship to the harmonic relationships between particle-defining objects. More specifically a catalytic modification to Spinors, which are a mathematical objects that describe the wave functions of fermions, specifically spin-1/2 particles in Quantum Field Theory.
Biologically and psychologically speaking, it reorganises our relationship to wave functions. Wave functions are the electrical waves or events that make things real to our brain and sensory existence. They make “things real” to us and are fundamental to teh development of our sense of consciousness, self and reality.
The Dot theory is a theoretical elaboration on one singular aspect of the theory of General Relativity: that of the logical representation of our individual, real-world relationship to the way we calculate reality through the relationships represented in Quantum mechanics. Its effect (of applying the Dot theory) enables a better and more accurate understanding of reality, and the paper presents a practical use-case (solving a problem in healthcare) to achieve valuable real world improvements for humans by evaluating and predicting best-outcomes for treatment and lifestyle modification. It’s weird, I know.
The fact that we are discussing data that describes the human experience of reality as a “health-data set” (collection of stuff that describes how you’re put together and how that feels to you) in this clinical use case example, demonstrates how this theory introduces the individual observer perspective into the calculation. That’s what’s weird. We always used to do math in pursuit of some universal truth. When you accept there is no universal truth that can be universally described, you see that you can only really take your own point of view. That is what this is: the math is being done from the observer’s point of view, not everyone’s.
In this sense, the Dot theory posits that Einstein was correct by introducing his universal constant (if you knew), but Quantum mechanics was using Spinors with set-defined terms that enable/unavoidably create lensing. The Dot theory, is in this mathematical sense, simply a redefinition of the terms of our relationship to angular position and momentum as presented in the Spinor (terms that define the geometry of how things relate).
Please support this work by purchasing a copy on Kindle or subscribing to our Patreon page here.
The aims of this project are to:
a) publish for internet-review this GUT and claim Copyright/authorship.
b) draw attention and offer the opportunity to develop its applications and implementations as open-source access knowledge.
c) draw intellectual and investor support to the realization of its first real-world application:
the delivery of improved healthcare by a shift in computational perspective on data.
Thank you,
Stefaan and Team